automatic-code-review

Review modified files against customizable semantic rules via hook-driven agents.

1|Updated Mar 16, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/michelve/hugin-cowork --skill automatic-code-review
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: automatic-code-review
Source: https://github.com/michelve/hugin-cowork/tree/main/skills/automatic-code-review
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/michelve/hugin-cowork --skill automatic-code-review

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill includes scripts (resource) and references (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

This Skill automates the process of reviewing code changes, ensuring adherence to semantic rules and best practices without manual intervention after each modification.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Hook-driven reviews: Automatically triggers code reviews after file modifications using lifecycle hooks.
  • Customizable rules: Allows users to define project-specific semantic rules for code quality.
  • Use Case: After Claude modifies a set of TypeScript files, this Skill automatically reviews them against predefined rules for type safety and code clarity, flagging potential issues before they are committed.

Quick Start

Configure the automatic code review rules in .claude/automatic-code-review/rules.md.

Frequently Asked Questions about automatic-code-review

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I automate semantic code review for TypeScript file modifications?

Automate semantic code review by configuring hook-driven agents that trigger automatically after TypeScript file modifications. You define project-specific coding standards and best practices in a customizable rule file, and the system analyzes changed files post-modification to flag potential issues.

How does hook-driven code review work for enforcing project coding standards?

Hook-driven code review works by using lifecycle hooks that trigger automated agents after file modifications. These agents analyze the changed files against your predefined semantic rules and coding standards, flagging potential issues before they are committed.

Can I use custom rules to enforce specific best practices during an automated code review?

Yes, you can use custom rules to enforce specific best practices. You define project-specific semantic rules for code quality in a designated markdown file, allowing the automated review process to check for type safety and code clarity based on your exact standards.

Do I need shell scripting to set up automated code review hooks?

Yes, you need shell scripting to set up automated code review hooks. The system requires shell scripting for logging and orchestrating the hook-driven agents, while the overall configuration is managed via JSON settings files.

What is the best way to review code changes against predefined rules without manual intervention?

The best way to review code changes without manual intervention is using hook-driven agents that automatically trigger post-modification. This approach analyzes changed files against your customizable semantic rule files, enforcing project-specific coding standards continuously.

Are there limitations to using JSON settings for managing automated code review configurations?

Managing automated code review via JSON settings requires shell scripting knowledge for logging and agent orchestration. Limitations include the need to manually maintain semantic rule files and the dependency on lifecycle hooks to properly trigger post-modification file analysis.