autonomous-loops

Resolve failing .NET builds and tests with bounded autonomous iteration loops.

1|Updated Apr 28, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/Trossitec/dotnet-claude-kit --skill autonomous-loops-trossitec
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: autonomous-loops
Source: https://github.com/Trossitec/dotnet-claude-kit/tree/main/skills/autonomous-loops
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/Trossitec/dotnet-claude-kit --skill autonomous-loops-trossitec

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

Autonomous coding agents often get stuck in repeated, unbounded retries when builds fail or tests break, wasting tokens and time while making unclear or risky changes.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Build-Fix Loops: Iteratively run dotnet build, parse compiler errors, categorize them (e.g., missing using/reference, type mismatch, API change), apply targeted fixes, and stop on PASS/STUCK/FAIL/REGRESSION.
  • Test-Fix Loops: Iteratively run dotnet test, parse failing tests, diagnose each failure to decide whether to fix test or production, apply the correct fix, and stop when progress stalls.
  • Refactor and Scaffold Loops: Execute multi-step refactors with build+test verification per step, or scaffold new features end-to-end (generate → build-fix → generate tests → test-fix → diagnostics/anti-pattern checks).
  • Safety Guardrails: Enforce bounded iterations, progress detection, atomicity per iteration, regression detection with revert, and emergency exits for critical issues or user interruption.
  • Transparency Reporting: Provide per-iteration summaries of what changed and why, including error/failure counts and statuses.

Use Case Example: When you ask Claude to “keep going until it works” after a .NET change introduces compilation errors and failing tests, this Skill drives a loop that fixes build errors first, then diagnoses and fixes failing tests, with explicit stopping rules and clear iteration-by-iteration reporting.

Quick Start

Load the autonomous-loops skill and tell Claude to “fix the build and make the tests pass for this .NET solution, stop when it’s stuck or when tests and build are green.”

Frequently Asked Questions about autonomous-loops

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I fix failing .NET builds and tests without an AI agent getting stuck in a loop?

Fixing failing .NET builds and tests without getting stuck requires bounded autonomous loops that apply targeted fixes, verify progress, and exit safely on PASS, STUCK, or FAIL. This approach enforces max-iteration budgets and atomic per-iteration changes to prevent unbounded retries.

What is the best way to automate multi-step refactoring with build and test verification?

The best way to automate multi-step refactoring with build and test verification is using bounded iteration loops. These loops execute incremental code changes while running dotnet build and dotnet test per step, automatically reverting regressions and stopping when progress stalls.

How does progress detection work when iteratively fixing dotnet compilation errors?

Progress detection works by parsing compiler errors, categorizing them (e.g., missing reference, type mismatch), and applying targeted fixes per iteration. The loop measures error and failure counts transparently, stopping safely if progress stalls or a critical failure triggers an emergency exit.

Can I use an autonomous coding agent to scaffold new .NET features end-to-end?

Yes, you can use autonomous coding agents to scaffold new .NET features end-to-end. Bounded loops orchestrate the full workflow: generating code, fixing builds, generating tests, fixing failing tests, and running diagnostics, all while enforcing iteration limits and safe exit rules.

What are the limitations of using bounded loops for automated test fixing?

Limitations of bounded loops for automated test fixing include max-iteration budgets that halt the process if progress stalls, mandatory emergency exits for critical failures, and automatic regression handling that reverts changes, meaning highly complex or systemic issues may require manual intervention.

Do I need to manually revert code changes if a test-fix loop introduces a regression?

No, you do not need to manually revert code changes if a test-fix loop introduces a regression. The bounded loop includes automated regression handling that detects failures and reverts atomic per-iteration changes, ensuring the codebase remains stable while transparently reporting the issue.