autoplan

Automated multi-discipline plan reviews are executed by orchestrating CEO, design, and engineering evaluations in a single command, applying a unified 6-principle framework to generate auto-decisions and a fully documented audit trail for PRs.

An automated plan review pipeline reads plan files and related artifacts, applies six decision principles across CEO, design, and engineering disciplines, and outputs a fully documented audit trail with telemetry and a final taste gate for borderline scope decisions.

Yes, you can run automated plan reviews on feature branches by executing a single command that orchestrates CEO, design, and engineering evaluations, applies auto-decisions, and surfaces only borderline taste decisions at a final approval gate.

Auditing decision principles across teams is best handled by an automated pipeline that applies a unified 6-principle framework to plan files, producing consistent outputs, telemetry, and an auditable run trail for every review.

No external dependencies are required to run the automated review pipeline with a taste gate; the system reads plan files and related artifacts directly, applies the six decision principles internally, and outputs documented artifacts autonomously.

You should avoid using an automated multi-discipline review pipeline for plans that lack structured plan files or related artifacts, as the system relies on reading those inputs to apply its six decision principles and generate an audit trail.