autoplan

Automating sequential project plan reviews executes CEO, design, engineering, and developer experience validation in a single command. It reads review skill definitions from disk and applies decision principles to produce a fully reviewed plan with automated decisions and human approval gates.

An automated review pipeline for plan validation runs multiple domain-specific critiques sequentially to comprehensively evaluate architecture and design before implementation. It eliminates manual invocation by automatically applying decision principles and surfacing only subjective taste decisions for final approval.

Yes, you can run architecture validation and code review without manual intermediate questions by using an automated decision pipeline. It applies six decision principles to make clear-cut calls automatically and only surfaces borderline scope or close approaches for your final approval.

Yes, automated plan validation requires git branch context, decision principle configuration, and review skill definitions stored on disk. These prerequisites provide the necessary environment rules and domain criteria to execute the sequential review gauntlet and generate automated decisions.

The best way to streamline design critique and engineering review is deploying a one-command sequential review pipeline. This approach replaces manually running four separate review skills and answering 15-30 intermediate questions with an automated gauntlet that applies decision principles directly.

You should not use automated decision pipelines for plan reviews when your project lacks defined review skill definitions on disk or requires highly custom, non-sequential validation outside of CEO, design, engineering, and DX domains. The pipeline depends on structured decision principles and standard domain scopes to automate effectively.