autoplan

Execute sequential CEO, design, engineering, and DX planning reviews from disk.

Updated Apr 1, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/whd4/gstack --skill autoplan-whd4
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: autoplan
Source: https://github.com/whd4/gstack/tree/main/autoplan
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/whd4/gstack --skill autoplan-whd4

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

Automates end-to-end planning reviews by orchestrating CEO, design, engineering, and DX evaluations from disk and surfacing a final plan for approval.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Sequential multi-skill execution: CEO review, design critique, engineering plan, and DX readiness checks are run in order with auto-decisions.
  • Single-command execution: One command to run the entire plan review gauntlet and obtain a fully reviewed plan.
  • Proactive guidance: detects when a plan file exists and suggests running the full review without prompting for 15-30 questions.

Quick Start

Invoke autoplan on your active plan file to generate a complete auto-reviewed plan.

Frequently Asked Questions about autoplan

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I automate end-to-end planning reviews for a project plan file?

You can automate planning reviews by orchestrating sequential CEO, design, engineering, and DX evaluations from disk to surface a final plan for approval. This sequential multi-skill execution applies a six-decision-principle gate to auto-decide and output a reviewed plan.

What is the best way to run multi-role evaluations like CEO and engineering critiques on an existing plan?

Running multi-role evaluations sequentially in a single command is the best way to process an existing plan file. It executes CEO review, design critique, engineering plan, and DX readiness checks in order, then auto-decides and surfaces near-misses.

Can I auto-decide and surface near-misses in a planning pipeline without answering numerous questions?

Yes, you can auto-decide and surface near-misses in a planning pipeline without manual prompting. The sequential review process detects when a plan file exists and proactively suggests running the full evaluation gauntlet without asking 15-30 questions.

Does planning review automation require any specific dependencies or external components to execute?

Planning review automation requires no external dependencies or components to execute the sequential evaluations. It reads the plan directly from disk and runs the sub-skills internally to apply the decision gate and output a single final plan.

When should I use a sequential multi-skill review pipeline instead of manual plan evaluation?

You should use a sequential multi-skill review pipeline when a plan file exists and you need to apply a six-decision-principle gate across CEO, design, engineering, and DX perspectives. It provides proactive guidance and outputs a fully reviewed plan for approval.

What limitations exist when using auto-decision gates for plan review pipelines?

A limitation of auto-decision gates for plan review pipelines is that they require a pre-existing plan file on disk to function. Without an active plan file, the sequential sub-skills cannot execute the evaluations or surface a final plan.