avad-design-review

Audits live-site visuals and fixes design inconsistencies with atomic commits.

Updated Mar 18, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/agwacom/avadbot --skill avad-design-review
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: avad-design-review
Source: https://github.com/agwacom/avadbot/tree/main/skills/avad-design-review
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/agwacom/avadbot --skill avad-design-review

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

Designer's eye QA: finds visual inconsistency, spacing issues, hierarchy problems, AI slop patterns, and slow interactions — then fixes them. Iteratively fixes issues in source code, committing each fix atomically and re-verifying with before/after screenshots. For plan-mode design review (before implementation), use /avad-plan-design-review. Use when asked to "audit the design", "visual QA", "check if it looks good", or "design polish".

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Visual QA across live sites to detect layout and typography issues.
  • Iterative fixes with atomic commits and before/after verification screenshots.
  • Plan-mode design review workflow via /avad-plan-design-review.

Quick Start

Provide a design audit by specifying the target URL, scope, and depth in a live project.

Frequently Asked Questions about avad-design-review

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I run a visual QA audit on a live site to find UI design flaws?

Visual QA audits live-site visuals to detect layout, typography, and spacing inconsistencies. You provide a target URL, scope, and depth to identify design-system validation issues and AI slop patterns across pages and components.

What is the best way to fix visual inconsistency and spacing issues in source code?

Fixing visual inconsistency requires iteratively updating source code and committing each design fix atomically. The process ensures visual polish by re-verifying changes with before and after screenshots for reliable UI regression tracking.

Can I review UI design and hierarchy problems before implementation?

You can review UI hierarchy problems before implementation using a plan-mode design review workflow. This evaluates proposed visual design and interactions without modifying live source code directly.

Does design-system validation work for individual components and interactions?

Design-system validation works across pages, components, and interactions on a live site. It checks for visual inconsistencies and spacing issues, ensuring UI polish and consistent design patterns throughout the entire project.