avad-plan-design-review

To review a design plan, analyze its information architecture, interaction flow, and accessibility to surface gaps and risks. This process evaluates alignment with user goals and applies design principles to ensure consistency across components before implementation begins.

A design plan review is a critique process that identifies scope drift and enforces design principles before development. You need it when a team requires a rigorous evaluation of information architecture and interaction flow to prevent costly implementation errors.

Yes, a design review can evaluate accessibility and consistency across components. It applies core design principles to the submitted plan, generating concrete recommendations and risk flags that highlight areas needing immediate improvement.

The best way to prevent scope drift is to conduct a rigorous plan critique that surfaces design gaps and risks. By evaluating alignment with user goals early, teams receive actionable recommendations and rationale to maintain focus.

Evaluating interaction flow relies on the submitted design plan's completeness; if the plan lacks detailed component states, the review cannot fully predict accessibility constraints. It outputs risk flags but requires existing documentation to analyze information architecture.