ax-cpp-llm

Generate C++ code using the Ax axllm package without TypeScript-only APIs.

2.9k|186|Updated Feb 23, 2023
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/ax-llm/ax --skill ax-cpp-llm
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: ax-cpp-llm
Source: https://github.com/ax-llm/ax/tree/main/website/static/cpp/.well-known/agent-skills/ax-cpp-llm
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/ax-llm/ax --skill ax-cpp-llm

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

This Skill helps you write correct C++ code for the generated Ax package without accidentally using TypeScript-only APIs or mismatched call shapes.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Native C++ entrypoints for signatures, providers, agents, flows, and optimizers.
  • Guidance grounded in package docs, API reference, capability manifests, and runnable examples.
  • Useful for translating Ax concepts into C++ implementations for local development, provider-backed calls, and optimization workflows.

Quick Start

Ask for a C++ Ax example or implementation and specify the provider, signature, agent, or flow you want, then have the assistant base the answer on the axllm package docs and examples.

Frequently Asked Questions about ax-cpp-llm

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I implement Ax agents and flows in C++ instead of TypeScript?

You can implement Ax agents and flows in C++ by generating native code using the Ax axllm package, ensuring you use the correct C++ API surface from package docs rather than TypeScript-only APIs.

Why does my Ax C++ code fail when using TypeScript API call shapes?

Your Ax C++ code fails because the axllm package requires native C++ API entrypoints for signatures and providers, making unsupported TypeScript-only call shapes invalid at runtime.

Can I use provider routing and optimizers in native C++ Ax workflows?

Yes, you can use provider routing and optimizers in native C++ Ax workflows by grounding your implementation in the axllm package's capability manifests and runtime profiles for correct provider-backed calls.

What do I need to write correct Ax C++ code for local development?

To write correct Ax C++ code for local development, you need the axllm package documentation, API reference, capability manifests, and runnable examples as the source of truth for signatures and agents.

What's the best way to translate Ax concepts into C++ implementations?

The best way to translate Ax concepts into C++ implementations is through package-doc-driven development, grounding signatures, agents, and flows in the axllm API reference to avoid mismatched call shapes.