axiom-synchronization

Provide Mutex, OSAllocatedUnfairLock, and Atomic types for thread-safe Swift synchronization.

Updated Dec 3, 2025
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/tuliopc23/flying-dutchman-app --skill axiom-synchronization
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: axiom-synchronization
Source: https://github.com/tuliopc23/flying-dutchman-app/tree/main/.claude/skills/axiom-synchronization
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/tuliopc23/flying-dutchman-app --skill axiom-synchronization

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill includes references (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

This Skill addresses the need for efficient and safe management of shared mutable state in concurrent Swift applications, particularly when performance is critical and actors might be too heavyweight.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Thread-Safe Primitives: Provides Mutex, OSAllocatedUnfairLock, and Atomic types for robust synchronization.
  • Performance Optimization: Offers low-level control for microsecond operations where actors introduce too much overhead.
  • Use Case: Protect a high-frequency counter or a frequently accessed shared resource in a performance-critical section of your application to prevent data races and ensure correctness.

Quick Start

Use the axiom-synchronization skill to protect a shared integer counter with a Mutex.

Frequently Asked Questions about axiom-synchronization

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I protect a shared mutable state in Swift without using actors?

You can protect shared mutable state in Swift without actors by using synchronization primitives like Mutex, OSAllocatedUnfairLock, or Atomic types to manage concurrent access with lower overhead than actors.

What is the best way to update a high-frequency counter concurrently in Swift?

The best way to update a high-frequency counter concurrently in Swift is to apply Atomic types or Mutex locks, which prevent data races while offering low-latency, lock-free or fine-grained operations compared to standard actor isolation.

When should I use OSAllocatedUnfairLock instead of Swift actors?

You should use OSAllocatedUnfairLock instead of Swift actors for performance-critical sections requiring microsecond-level operations, as actors introduce too much overhead for high-frequency updates and fine-grained locking requirements.

Can I perform lock-free operations on shared state in Swift?

Yes, you can perform lock-free operations on shared state in Swift by using Atomic types, which provide safe cross-concurrency sharing and prevent data races without the scheduling overhead of actors or traditional locking mechanisms.

What are the limitations of using low-level synchronization primitives in Swift?

The limitations of using low-level synchronization primitives in Swift include increased complexity in managing fine-grained locking manually, requiring careful implementation to avoid deadlocks while ensuring safe concurrent access across shared mutable state.