behavioral-kernel

Define minimal change scopes and verification plans for coding tasks.

Updated Jun 18, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/MinhDuyDEV/mdpi --skill behavioral-kernel
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: behavioral-kernel
Source: https://github.com/MinhDuyDEV/mdpi/tree/main/.pi/skills/behavioral-kernel
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/MinhDuyDEV/mdpi --skill behavioral-kernel

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

This Skill prevents software work from drifting into unnecessary complexity, silent assumptions, uncontrolled scope expansion, and unsupported completion claims.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Scope Control: Helps agents define the smallest acceptable change and avoid unrelated modifications during implementation.
  • Assumption Management: Encourages explicit clarification of ambiguous requirements before committing to a solution.
  • Verification Discipline: Establishes proof paths and verification steps before claiming that work is complete.

Quick Start

Use the behavioral-kernel skill to review my current coding approach, identify drift risks, and define a minimal change with a verification plan.

Frequently Asked Questions about behavioral-kernel

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I prevent uncontrolled scope expansion during software refactoring?

To prevent uncontrolled scope expansion during software refactoring, define the smallest acceptable change explicitly and execute minimal-diff modifications to avoid unrelated code drift. This ensures coding decisions remain focused and disciplined.

What is assumption management in software engineering tasks?

Assumption management in software engineering is the practice of surfacing silent assumptions by explicitly clarifying ambiguous requirements before committing to an implementation solution. It prevents undocumented decisions from causing unsupported completion claims.

How do I establish verification discipline for coding completion claims?

To establish verification discipline for coding completion claims, define explicit proof paths and verification steps before marking work complete. This evidence-based approach validates requirement interpretation and confirms implementation boundaries.

Does this approach work for interpreting ambiguous software requirements?

Yes, this approach works for interpreting ambiguous software requirements by enforcing explicit scope definition and assumption clarification. It guides agents to question unclear boundaries before proceeding with implementation decisions.

What are the limitations of minimal-diff execution in coding?

The limitation of minimal-diff execution in coding is that it strictly restricts modifications to defined boundaries, preventing large-scale architectural changes. It should not be used when broad, systemic refactoring is intentionally required.