better-result-adopt

To adopt the Result pattern safely, limit changes to explicitly requested modules and apply transformations strictly at I/O boundaries. This approach preserves your surrounding architecture while introducing TaggedError models only where desired.

The best way to introduce TaggedError models is to start at I/O boundaries within a specifically requested module. Apply Result-based transformations only at these explicit edges to maintain consistency with the existing codebase architecture.

Yes, you can apply Result-based transformations to an isolated module without affecting surrounding code. Scope is limited strictly to the requested boundaries, preventing unintended cross-project refactors and preserving the existing architecture.

You should not use the Result pattern unless you explicitly request it or the target code already uses it. Introducing these models unrequested can cause unintended cross-project refactors and disrupt existing error-handling consistency.

Using TaggedError patterns does not require modifying existing TypeScript architecture. Refactoring strictly preserves the surrounding architecture by applying Result utilities only at the explicit edges of the requested scope.

Limiting better-result adoption to explicit opt-in requests prevents unintended cross-project refactors. It ensures TaggedError models and Result utilities are introduced only at the edges of the requested scope, maintaining codebase consistency.