beyond-solid-principles

To audit source code for architecture principles, analyze the system against ten foundational design rules including Separation of Concerns, DRY, and Loose Coupling. This process identifies hidden coupling and complexity, providing prioritized recommendations for refactoring to improve maintainability.

Checking for system-level design principle violations involves analyzing source code against rules like KISS, YAGNI, and High Cohesion. This targeted principle check provides actionable findings with severity ratings, specific code locations, and concrete remediation suggestions to guide your refactoring efforts.

Yes, you can perform targeted principle checks to focus on specific design concerns like the Law of Demeter or DRY. This allows you to address particular architectural issues directly and receive actionable findings tailored to that specific principle violation.

Slow development cycles and frequent bugs often stem from violations of foundational system-level architecture principles beyond SOLID, such as hidden coupling or low cohesion. Auditing the system architecture for issues like Build for Change and Design for Failure reveals complexity and provides prioritized remediation suggestions.

Yes, the architecture audit provides actionable findings for each identified violation. It includes severity ratings to help prioritize fixes, precise locations within the source code, and concrete remediation suggestions to resolve issues related to principles like Principle of Least Surprise.

You need to check your system architecture for Design for Failure and Build for Change when your software requires higher robustness and evolvability. Auditing these foundational principles helps identify structural weaknesses, ensuring your system can handle unexpected failures and adapt to future requirements.