bgpt-paper-search

Retrieve structured experimental fields from scientific paper full texts via BGPT MCP server.

Updated May 24, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/Estrella-231/Mathematical_modeling_tongmeng --skill bgpt-paper-search-estrella-231
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: bgpt-paper-search
Source: https://github.com/Estrella-231/Mathematical_modeling_tongmeng/tree/main/.agents/skills/bgpt-paper-search
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/Estrella-231/Mathematical_modeling_tongmeng --skill bgpt-paper-search-estrella-231

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

It eliminates the time-consuming task of digging through abstracts to find experimental methods and quantitative results that are often only available in full-text papers.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Full-text structured retrieval: Returns detailed per-study fields (e.g., methods, results, sample sizes, quality scores, conclusions) extracted from actual paper content.
  • Evidence-focused discovery: Supports systematic and scoping literature reviews, evidence tables, and comparisons of study designs across papers.
  • Quantitative detail harvesting: Finds experimental parameters and metrics that are frequently missing from abstracts alone.

Quick Start

Use bgpt-paper-search to find papers related to a topic like "CRISPR gene editing efficiency in human cells" and retrieve structured experimental fields from full text via the BGPT MCP server.

Frequently Asked Questions about bgpt-paper-search

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I extract experimental data and methods from full-text scientific papers?

To extract experimental data from scientific papers, you need a structured retrieval tool that returns detailed per-study fields like methods, results, and sample sizes directly from full-text content.

What is the best way to collect quantitative results for a systematic literature review?

Collecting quantitative results for a systematic literature review requires harvesting structured experimental parameters and metrics from full-text papers, overcoming the detail limitations of abstracts.

Can I get structured study quality scores and sample sizes across multiple papers?

You can retrieve structured study quality scores and sample sizes across multiple papers by extracting over 25 structured fields per study, enabling direct cross-study aggregation and comparison.

Do I need a specific server connection to retrieve full-text evidence synthesis data?

Yes, retrieving full-text evidence synthesis data requires a BGPT MCP server connection to access and return the 25+ structured experimental fields from the scientific papers.

When should I use full-text extraction instead of abstracts for evidence tables?

You should use full-text extraction instead of abstracts for evidence tables when abstracts lack sufficient detail for study method comparison, outcome extraction, and quantitative cross-study aggregation.