bmad-advanced-elicitation

Structured elicitation applies techniques like Socratic questioning and red-teaming to iteratively refine generated content. This flow uses a method registry and agent manifest to tailor critique, pushing outputs toward deeper clarity and improved edge case coverage.

To challenge assumptions in a generated PRD, apply multi-perspective critique using structured elicitation. Loading an agent manifest simulates viewpoints like CEO, Engineering, and Security, iteratively probing the document to improve robustness and goal alignment.

Yes, multi-perspective critique improves an LLM workflow outline by applying structured elicitation across different stakeholder views. This iterative process challenges assumptions and refines the output, ensuring comprehensive coverage of edge cases and traceable improvements.

Yes, a method registry is required to tailor the elicitation flow to the current task. Along with an agent manifest, it defines the specific critique techniques applied, ensuring the iterative improvement cycle remains structured, reproducible, and aligned with your goals.

Structured elicitation improves output quality by applying repeatable critique techniques rather than simple revision. It enforces iterative refinement cycles with safeguards for traceability, pushing for deeper analysis of edge cases and precise alignment with intended goals.

Avoid advanced elicitation for prompt refinement when lacking a defined method registry or agent manifest. Without these prerequisites, the structured critique flow cannot be properly tailored, potentially leading to unstructured feedback loops instead of traceable, iterative improvement.