bmad-advanced-elicitation

Red teaming critiques help pressure-test assumptions by simulating adversarial attacks on your draft's logic. This structured refinement loop systematically exposes blind spots and risks in your generated content, pushing the model to reconsider shallow reasoning and enhance depth.

You need Socratic questioning or first-principles analysis when a strategy memo, feature spec, or recommendation feels too generic. These elicitation methods systematically deepen analysis, ensuring your document contains rigorous reasoning rather than superficial conclusions.

Yes, you can apply elicitation methods to enhance a specific document section without rewriting the entire artifact. The interactive refinement loop targets only the chosen draft, applying context-aware critique frameworks until the desired depth is achieved.

The best way to pressure-test assumptions in a generated strategy memo is using a pre-mortem analysis or red teaming critique. These structured methods force the model to reconsider its initial reasoning, surface potential risks, and refine the draft through iterative enhancement loops.

An interactive refinement loop works by presenting multiple critique options, letting you apply one or more methods, and iterating until you choose to proceed. It selects context-aware elicitation methods based on your document's specific needs to repeatedly enhance the content.

A limitation of using critique frameworks for stakeholder-sensitive analysis is that they require ordered execution and repeated user confirmation. The process cannot autonomously rewrite entire documents from scratch, meaning you must actively guide the interactive refinement loop to achieve the desired depth.