bmad-check-readiness

To validate a PRD and architecture, you perform an adversarial review of planning documents to check for gaps and alignment. This readiness check ensures epics meet quality standards before development begins.

An adversarial review for epic quality and PRD analysis critically assesses planning documents to find inconsistencies and gaps. It validates epic coverage and UX alignment through a structured six-step workflow.

To check if epics cover PRD requirements, run a phased workflow that validates epic coverage against the PRD. This process analyzes document discovery, UX alignment, and epic quality to ensure full traceability.

You should run a readiness check on planning documents before starting development on a new feature. Validating PRD, architecture, and epics at this phase prevents costly rework later in the implementation stage.

A solutioning workflow readiness validation requires a strict six-step process: document discovery, PRD analysis, epic coverage validation, UX alignment, epic quality review, and final assessment to confirm implementation readiness.

Yes, an epic review workflow finds gaps in architecture design by validating architecture documents alongside PRDs and epics. It performs an adversarial review to ensure all planning documents are fully aligned.