bmad-checkpoint-preview

To perform a structured pull request review, use a multi-step workflow that guides you through orientation, walkthrough, detail pass, and testing. This approach focuses on architectural boundaries and design intent rather than just mechanical file diffs.

Intent-based code analysis evaluates commit walkthroughs by generating review trails based on design intent rather than raw file changes. It automatically identifies architectural concerns to keep your review focused on high-risk areas during the assessment.

Yes, you can review local git changes through a human-in-the-loop guided workflow. The process requires integration with your local git state and project-specific configuration files to provide context-aware feedback during the assessment.

Yes, a context-aware code review requires project-specific configuration files alongside local git state integration. These inputs provide the necessary context for the tool to generate intent-based feedback and identify architectural concerns accurately.

Use a structured multi-step analysis for complex pull requests or architectural design assessments where standard diff reviews fall short. It ensures you focus on architectural boundaries and high-risk areas rather than getting lost in mechanical code changes.