bmad-create-epics-and-stories

Decompose product requirements and architecture decisions into epics and user stories with acceptance criteria.

3|2|Updated Mar 29, 2024
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/josemariafs/MVTools --skill bmad-create-epics-and-stories-josemariafs
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: bmad-create-epics-and-stories
Source: https://github.com/josemariafs/MVTools/tree/main/.cursor/skills/bmad-create-epics-and-stories
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/josemariafs/MVTools --skill bmad-create-epics-and-stories-josemariafs

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

Transform requirements and architecture decisions into comprehensive, actionable epics and user stories organized by value, enabling predictable delivery.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Turn PRD, Architecture decisions, and UX insights into standalone epics and stories with clear acceptance criteria.
  • Provide complete FR/NFR traceability and alignment with architecture constraints for each story.
  • Enable collaborative, iterative refinement with product owners to align on user value and delivery risk.

Quick Start

Schedule input from PRD/Architecture/UX documents and begin generating the epic-and-story plan.

Frequently Asked Questions about bmad-create-epics-and-stories

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I translate product requirements into epics and user stories?

To translate product requirements into epics and user stories, decompose PRD and architecture decisions into standalone stories with clear acceptance criteria and traceable functional requirements. This ensures alignment with UX considerations and enables predictable delivery.

How does functional and non-functional requirement mapping work for user stories?

Functional and non-functional requirement mapping links each generated user story to specific FR and NFR constraints from the architecture documents. This provides complete traceability, ensuring every standalone story aligns with technical constraints and UX considerations.

What is the best way to break down architecture decisions for single-developer completion?

The best way to break down architecture decisions for single-developer completion is organizing outputs into standalone user stories with clear acceptance criteria. This approach aligns technical constraints and UX considerations into manageable execution units.

Can I generate a complete epics-and-stories list from a PRD and UX insights?

Yes, you can generate a complete epics-and-stories list by applying product requirements, architecture decisions, and UX insights as inputs. The process produces standalone stories organized by value with complete FR/NFR traceability.

Do I need architecture documents to create user stories with acceptance criteria?

Architecture documents are highly recommended to create user stories with accurate acceptance criteria. Scheduling input from PRD, architecture, and UX documents ensures stories align with technical constraints and provides complete FR/NFR traceability.

How do I align user stories with product owners for delivery risk assessment?

To align user stories with product owners for delivery risk assessment, use iterative refinement during the decomposition process. This collaborative approach ensures alignment on user value and delivery risk before finalizing the epic-and-story plan.