bmad-editorial-review-prose

Review prose for clarity issues and output a three-column editorial table.

Updated Apr 12, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/clovernguyen1010-ship-it/Clover_Nguyen --skill bmad-editorial-review-prose-clovernguyen1010-ship-it
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: bmad-editorial-review-prose
Source: https://github.com/clovernguyen1010-ship-it/Clover_Nguyen/tree/main/_bmad/core/bmad-editorial-review-prose
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/clovernguyen1010-ship-it/Clover_Nguyen --skill bmad-editorial-review-prose-clovernguyen1010-ship-it

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

Clinical copy-editor that reviews text for communication issues and outputs recommended fixes in a three-column table. Use when you want to improve clarity without changing intent.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Identify clarity issues and ambiguous phrasing in user-provided text.
  • Output a three-column editorial table: Original Text | Revised Text | Changes, with location references.
  • Respect the provided style guide and preserve author voice; skip code blocks and frontmatter as encountered.
  • Provide deterministic, stepwise output and flag uncertainties as queries when needed.

Quick Start

Submit the text to review as content, optionally include a style_guide and reader_type, and I will return a three-column table of suggested edits.

Frequently Asked Questions about bmad-editorial-review-prose

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I review prose for clarity issues and get suggested fixes?

To review prose for clarity, submit your text content and optionally a style guide. The tool identifies ambiguous phrasing and returns a three-column table showing original text, revised text, and the rationale for each change.

What is the best way to copyedit text without changing the author's original intent?

The best way to copyedit without altering intent is applying stepwise revisions that preserve the author voice. This process flags uncertainties as queries and focuses strictly on clarity fixes rather than rewriting your core message.

Can I apply a custom style guide when copyediting my content?

Yes, you can include a custom style guide when submitting content. The editorial review honors your provided guidelines consistently across all prose, ensuring deterministic output that aligns with your specific formatting and tone rules.

Does the editorial review process skip code blocks and frontmatter?

Yes, the editorial review skips code blocks and markup frontmatter as encountered. It processes only the prose sections of your document, ensuring that technical syntax and structural metadata remain untouched during the clarity review.

What format does the editorial review output use for suggested text changes?

The editorial review outputs a three-column table containing Original Text, Revised Text, and Changes. This format includes location references and provides a clear rationale for each suggested edit, making it easy to review and apply fixes.

How do I handle ambiguous phrasing in my content during an editorial review?

To handle ambiguous phrasing, the editorial review identifies clarity issues and produces precise fixes. It flags any uncertainties as queries, allowing you to resolve unclear meaning while maintaining the original author voice.