bmad-editorial-review-prose

You can copy-edit markdown, plain text, or XML to improve clarity by receiving a structured table of suggested improvements that identify communication friction. This clinical review preserves your authorial voice while ensuring style-guide compliance.

The best way to review technical documents for communication friction is to apply clinical copy-editing principles based on the Microsoft Writing Style Guide. This objective review identifies comprehension issues and provides precise editorial feedback for clear stakeholder communication.

Yes, clinical copy-editing supports dual-mode calibration allowing you to target either human readers or LLM-optimized precision. Context-aware editing validates input length and reader-type parameters to ensure the output meets specific style-guide requirements.

Yes, you can use style guide principles to review XML inputs for professional communication issues. The review process operates on markdown, plain text, or XML to identify barriers and suggest minimal, high-impact editorial fixes that ensure comprehension.

The limitation of automated prose review is that it focuses strictly on identifying and suggesting minimal fixes for comprehension barriers without rewriting content. It preserves the original authorial voice by design, meaning it will not perform heavy structural rewrites or alter foundational intent.