bmad-editorial-review-prose

Yes, you can customize the copy-editing process by specifying a style_guide and reader_type when submitting your text. This tailors the minimal, defensible fixes to match your exact editorial standards and target audience.

To copy-edit text for clarity while preserving the author's voice, identify communication issues and apply minimal, defensible fixes rather than full rewrites. This ensures the original stylistic choices remain intact while resolving ambiguous phrasing.

The best way to review technical documentation for communication issues is using a fixed editorial review sequence that skips code blocks, frontmatter, and structural markup. This targets prose clarity directly while leaving technical syntax untouched.

Format prose revisions using a structured three-column table containing Original Text, Revised Text, and Changes. This outputs a precise, minimal fix list that transparently documents every defensible edit made to the passage.

Yes, the editorial review process works on both short passages and longer documents across formal and technical writing. It enforces a fixed review sequence to consistently identify clarity issues regardless of text length.

Yes, you can customize the copy-editing process by specifying a style_guide and reader_type when submitting your text. This tailors the minimal, defensible fixes to match your exact editorial standards and target audience.