bmad-editorial-review-structure

A structural editorial review improves document clarity by proposing concise cuts and reorganization that simplify complex documents while preserving the original meaning. It highlights redundancies and structural improvements to enhance readability.

Structural editing identifies superficial versus substantive changes needed to improve readability and flow while preserving meaning. You need it when a document requires reorganization and simplification prior to copy-editing.

You simplify complex documents by applying deterministic editorial steps that propose structural cuts and reorganization. This process enforces specific inputs and outputs to guide editing while preserving the original meaning.

Structural editing should be completed first. It proposes cuts and reorganization to simplify document structure and flow, serving as the prerequisite step before you begin copy-editing the text.

Yes, the editorial workflow highlights redundancies and proposes structural improvements to simplify complex documents. It applies deterministic steps to guide the reorganization process and improve overall readability.

Document structure remains unclear when superficial edits do not address substantive flow issues. A structural review is needed prior to copy-editing to reorganize content and eliminate redundancies that obscure meaning.