bmad-editorial-review-structure

To improve markdown document structure without losing meaning, you can run an editorial review that proposes cuts, reorganization, and simplification. This process preserves your original ideas while enhancing clarity and flow for readers.

Editorial review for document structure is the process of analyzing content to identify sections to cut, merge, move, or condense. You need it when readers struggle to find information quickly in guides, docs, or structured markdown content.

To reorganize a long markdown guide, apply a structural analysis that generates prioritized recommendations. This produces a change list indicating which sections to cut, merge, move, or condense before you begin copy editing.

Yes, you can simplify document content while preserving all original ideas. The review process reduces wasted words to improve comprehension but keeps the core content sacrosanct, ensuring no meaning is lost during reorganization.

The best way to review content flow before copy editing is to perform a structural editorial review. This approach focuses strictly on organization and brevity, generating a prioritized change list rather than fixing grammar or sentence-level issues.

Yes, this structural review works with guides, docs, and structured markdown content. It applies an inferred or provided structure model to analyze the document and output prioritized recommendations in a specified markdown format.