bmad-editorial-review-structure

Structural editing reorganizes sections and prunes extraneous content to improve document flow and clarity. You need it before copy editing when a lengthy proposal or policy requires upfront planning, scoping, and logical sequencing.

To get actionable recommendations to improve document structure, submit your content and an optional style guide. The review returns prioritized edits to cut, merge, move, or condense sections, complete with rationale and word-count impact estimates.

Yes, you can use a structural review for lengthy policy documents. It diagnoses misaligned sections and redundancies, reorganizing the content into a concise outline with clearly labeled sections and a logical progression for better reader comprehension.

Structural editing happens before copy editing. It ensures the document's structure, sequencing, and scannability are solid first, addressing gaps and logical flow before you move into line editing, reviews, or final polishing.

The best way to diagnose gaps and redundancies in a complex proposal is through structural diagnostics. This process identifies misaligned sections and extraneous content, providing precise edits to condense and merge text for tighter, clearer documents.