bmad-editorial-review-structure

To improve document structure without altering meaning, apply editorial principles to streamline sections and remove redundancy. This identifies structural weaknesses and proposes concise edits that prioritize high-value content.

Editorial review of structure optimizes document architecture for clarity and efficiency. You need it when you want to reorganize complex documents and propose targeted cuts before starting the final copy editing phase.

Streamline sections in complex documents by proposing targeted cuts and reorganization. This process removes redundancy while preserving essential information, ensuring the guidance is actionable and improves overall readability.

Structural editing works for automated review workflows by providing actionable and unambiguous guidance. The proposed concise edits are specifically designed to be suitable for direct integration into these automated processes.

This is not for copy editing or fixing grammar mistakes. It is designed for structural editing to optimize document architecture, meaning you should use it to address structural weaknesses before performing detailed copy edits.

Documents develop structural weaknesses from redundancy and poor organization. Fix them by applying editorial principles that propose concise edits, streamline sections, and preserve essential information to improve clarity.