bmad-editorial-review-structure

To restructure long-form documents, apply a structural editorial review that proposes cuts, reorganization, and simplification. This preserves comprehension while maximizing clarity, enforcing high-value-density writing by removing redundant content.

Structural editing for manuscripts and policy documents is a review process that identifies necessary cuts, reorganization, and simplification. It prioritizes front-loaded value and enforces a consistent editorial model to maintain clear hierarchy and flow.

To edit document structure step by step, provide the text for a concise structural review. The process outputs prioritized recommendations in order with rationale, applying deterministic revisions that front-load value and enforce high-value-density writing.

Yes, you can use structural editing for proposals and outlines. The process is suitable for editorial reviews of outlines, manuscripts, proposals, and policy documents, applying substantive structural edits to improve flow and readability.

The best way to enforce a consistent editorial model is to apply a stepwise, deterministic revision process. This ensures long-form content meets structural standards by prioritizing front-loaded value and removing redundant content.

You should avoid structural editorial reviews for short-form content or text that does not require clear hierarchy and flow. The process is designed for long-form content requiring substantive structural edits, cuts, and reorganization to preserve comprehension.