bmad-editorial-review-structure

To improve document structure without altering meaning, use an editorial review process that diagnoses weak ordering and redundancy, then applies prioritized recommendations like CUT, MERGE, MOVE, or CONDENSE to enhance clarity and information density.

The best way to restructure a long technical tutorial is to perform a structural diagnosis that identifies buried key points and scope drift, then produces an actionable edit plan to improve flow and comprehension for your specific readers.

Yes, you can optimize document structure for human or LLM readers by applying reader-aware recommendations that adapt principles for comprehension, density, and precision based on the target audience type specified during the editorial review.

To review a bloated product brief, conduct a structural editorial review that labels sections as CUT, MERGE, MOVE, CONDENSE, QUESTION, or PRESERVE, providing rationale and estimated impact to eliminate waste without losing core ideas.

You should use an editorial structural review before any copy editing begins when a document feels poorly ordered, repetitive, or hard to scan, ensuring the underlying ideas remain unchanged while improving overall information architecture.

Yes, an editorial review helps manage information density in strategic documents by identifying unnecessary detail and producing prioritized recommendations with comprehension trade-off notes, ensuring high density without sacrificing clarity.