bmad-editorial-review-structure

Editorial review for document structure analyzes headings, lists, and sectioning to reorganize and simplify text. It cuts clutter and redundancy while treating content as sacrosanct, ensuring the underlying ideas remain completely unchanged during the reorganization process.

Structural editorial review is a pre-copyediting pass that evaluates document comprehension and scan-ability. It applies a model-driven approach to infer purpose, analyze structure, and output prioritized recommendations for cutting, reorganizing, and simplifying content.

Technical writing can be optimized for dual reader types by applying structural editorial review. The process selects distinct pruning priorities, using engagement aids for human comprehension and precision-focused unambiguity rules for LLM reading.

Yes, editorial review can tighten document structure for specific audiences by accepting target audience and purpose as inputs. It chooses a structure model based on these parameters and validates each section against that model's primary rules.

No, editorial review for document structure preserves your original ideas entirely. It enforces a strict validation process where content is sacrosanct, meaning recommendations only address layout, flow, and redundancy without modifying the underlying meaning.