bmad-review-adversarial-general

To perform an adversarial content review, you provide your artifacts and the Skill applies a skeptical lens to rigorously question assumptions. It then generates a concise findings report detailing problems, impacts, and recommended fixes.

An adversarial content review is a skeptical analysis technique used to surface hidden issues and gaps in artifacts like diffs, specs, or stories. You need it when you want to rigorously question assumptions and identify risks before finalizing content.

Yes, you can review code diffs and technical specifications. The adversarial review process is flexible and suitable for analyzing various artifacts, including diffs, specs, stories, and any documentation provided by the user.

To generate a structured findings report from a content critique, the Skill identifies at least ten issues and produces a concise professional report. This report explicitly details the discovered problems, their impacts, and recommended fixes.

A cynical review goes beyond standard quality assurance by actively applying a skeptical lens to question underlying assumptions. It focuses on adversarial findings to surface deep inconsistencies and gaps rather than just checking for surface-level errors.

The primary limitation is that the adversarial review requires the user to provide the artifacts explicitly. It focuses on analyzing the supplied content like docs or specs rather than autonomously discovering or pulling external data for review.