bmad-review-adversarial-general

Identify and document adversarial findings from submitted content as a Markdown list.

4|1|Updated Sep 30, 2024

Search Tags:#documentation-review #content-quality #adversarial-review #findings-report #cynical-analysis #issues-identification

Ready to run

npx skills add https://github.com/co-cddo/ndx --skill bmad-review-adversarial-general-co-cddo

💬 Prompt for ChatGPT / Claude Chat▼

Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: bmad-review-adversarial-general
Source: https://github.com/co-cddo/ndx/tree/main/_bmad/core/bmad-review-adversarial-general
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/co-cddo/ndx --skill bmad-review-adversarial-general-co-cddo

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

Performs a Cynical Review and produces a findings report when a user requests a critical evaluation of content.

Core Features & Use Cases

Cynical adversarial analysis of content to identify issues and risks.
Findings documented as a Markdown list for easy review and remediation planning.
Use Case: review a product spec to surface missing requirements and potential design gaps.

Quick Start

Provide the content to review as input and I will produce a ten-point adversarial findings report.

Frequently Asked Questions about bmad-review-adversarial-general

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema

How do I perform an adversarial review on a product specification?▼

An adversarial review critically evaluates content like specifications or diffs to identify design gaps and risks. It produces a structured Markdown findings list containing at least ten documented issues, providing actionable remediation guidance to improve overall content rigor.

What is the best way to identify issues and risks in a technical diff?▼

The best way to identify issues in a technical diff is through cynical adversarial analysis. The process evaluates submitted artifacts and outputs a structured Markdown findings list containing at least ten discovered issues with actionable remediation guidance.

Can I use this to review user stories for missing requirements?▼

Yes, you can review user stories to surface missing requirements and potential design gaps. The cynical adversarial analysis applies to any artifact requiring critical evaluation, producing a Markdown findings list with at least ten issues and actionable remediation steps.

Does the adversarial findings report include remediation guidance?▼

Yes, the adversarial findings report includes actionable remediation guidance. The structured Markdown output documents a minimum of ten issues found during the cynical analysis, providing clear steps to improve content quality and rigor.

What is a cynical analysis for content quality and when do I need it?▼

A cynical analysis for content quality is a highly critical evaluation process that identifies issues and risks in artifacts like specifications or diffs. You need it when content requires maximum rigor, delivering a Markdown findings list of at least ten issues with remediation guidance.