bmad-review-adversarial-general

Adversarial review identifies quality gaps and potential issues in diffs, specs, or documents by actively looking for what is missing and what can break. It outputs a Markdown list of at least ten concrete issues to drive rapid iteration.

Cynical adversarial review is a critical assessment technique that actively searches for missing requirements and potential failure points rather than only obvious errors. It validates specs by producing structured issue descriptions for actionable feedback.

To get critical feedback, provide your document or story content to an adversarial review process. It detects empty inputs and generates a Markdown list of at least ten specific issue descriptions to fix before proceeding.

Adversarial review detects empty or unreadable content inputs and halts immediately to prevent meaningless output. This input-aware validation ensures the process only runs when valid content is loaded for assessment.

When risk detection finds no issues during a diff review, the process halts. This prevents the generation of meaningless or fabricated results, ensuring only concrete findings are reported as a Markdown issue list.