bmad-review-adversarial-general

Performs adversarial critiques of submitted artifacts and outputs Markdown lists of findings.

1|Updated May 16, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/enigmaicon-eng/AI-Enterprise-OS --skill bmad-review-adversarial-general-enigmaicon-eng
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: bmad-review-adversarial-general
Source: https://github.com/enigmaicon-eng/AI-Enterprise-OS/tree/main/examples/BMAD-METHOD/src/core-skills/bmad-review-adversarial-general
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/enigmaicon-eng/AI-Enterprise-OS --skill bmad-review-adversarial-general-enigmaicon-eng

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

It helps you uncover risks, omissions, and weak arguments in submitted work by forcing a skeptical, adversarial pass that produces actionable findings instead of polite summaries.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Adversarial analysis: Reviews any submitted artifact (diff, spec, story, doc, or similar) with extreme skepticism to surface problems you might miss.
  • Issue discovery with coverage: Targets missing elements as well as incorrect or weak elements, aiming for at least ten findings to avoid shallow critiques.
  • Structured output: Outputs findings as a Markdown list of description-only items that you can triage and address.

Quick Start

Ask the reviewer to evaluate the provided document or diff and return at least ten concrete issues to fix.

Frequently Asked Questions about bmad-review-adversarial-general

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I perform an adversarial review on a spec or diff to find risky assumptions?

An adversarial review uncovers risks and weak arguments in submitted work by forcing a skeptical pass that produces actionable findings. Instead of polite summaries, it outputs a Markdown list of at least ten concrete issues to triage and address.

What is adversarial spec review and how does it uncover hidden flaws?

An adversarial review uncovers risks and weak arguments in submitted work by forcing a skeptical pass that produces actionable findings. Instead of polite summaries, it outputs a Markdown list of at least ten concrete issues to triage and address.

Can I use a cynical review process on documentation and user stories?

An adversarial review uncovers risks and weak arguments in submitted work by forcing a skeptical pass that produces actionable findings. Instead of polite summaries, it outputs a Markdown list of at least ten concrete issues to triage and address.

What's the best way to generate a critical findings report for a document?

An adversarial review uncovers risks and weak arguments in submitted work by forcing a skeptical pass that produces actionable findings. Instead of polite summaries, it outputs a Markdown list of at least ten concrete issues to triage and address.

Does the adversarial review approach work on empty or incomplete drafts?

An adversarial review uncovers risks and weak arguments in submitted work by forcing a skeptical pass that produces actionable findings. Instead of polite summaries, it outputs a Markdown list of at least ten concrete issues to triage and address.