bmad-review-adversarial-general

Adversarial review inspects diffs, specs, stories, and documents with a critical mindset to identify hidden defects and weak assumptions. You submit the content and receive a concise Markdown list of actionable issues to fix before approval or merge.

Finding weak assumptions requires a skeptical review of the submitted draft to surface missing requirements and gaps. Submitting the document for an adversarial analysis generates a Markdown list of at least ten concrete findings for improvement.

Adversarial critique applies to uncommitted changes, branch diffs, and submitted artifacts. It requires readable input text to function; the review process halts if the provided content is empty or unreadable.

An adversarial document review returns a Markdown list containing at least ten concrete findings. These findings detail specific defects, gaps, and weak assumptions discovered during the skeptical inspection of the submitted content.

Submitting an empty or unreadable document for skeptical review causes the process to halt immediately. The analysis requires valid, readable input text to identify defects and generate the Markdown findings report.