skills.rest
imonmi
imonmiCOMMUNITY
Explore all skills by this author →
GitHub

bmad-review-adversarial-general

Identify gaps and risks in proposals, specifications, or documents.

Updated Mar 24, 2026
Search Tags:#quality-assurance#findings#content-review#adversarial-review#document-analysis#risk-identification
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/imonmi/INTER-EDU --skill bmad-review-adversarial-general-imonmi
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent▼
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: bmad-review-adversarial-general
Source: https://github.com/imonmi/INTER-EDU/tree/main/_bmad/core/skills/bmad-review-adversarial-general
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/imonmi/INTER-EDU --skill bmad-review-adversarial-general-imonmi

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

This skill provides a rigorous, skeptical review of user submissions to surface gaps, risks, and quality issues before decisions are made.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Adversarial analysis: critically examines content for assumptions, ambiguities, and missing requirements.
  • Findings report: outputs a structured, prioritized list of issues ready for remediation.
  • Use cases: review proposals, specs, requirements, docs, or code diffs to improve clarity and readiness.

Quick Start

Provide the content to review as input and request a findings report summarizing the top issues.

Frequently Asked Questions about bmad-review-adversarial-general

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I perform an adversarial review of a proposal to find gaps and risks?▼

An adversarial review critically examines your proposal for assumptions, ambiguities, and missing requirements, then outputs a structured, prioritized findings list for quick remediation.

What is the best way to critically analyze a specification document for missing requirements?▼

A skeptical analysis of your specification document identifies gaps, risks, and quality issues before decisions are made, presenting a concise and prioritized markdown list of problems to address.

Can I use this to review code diffs for clarity and readiness?▼

Yes, you can review code diffs by applying a skeptical, adversarial analysis to surface ambiguities and quality issues, producing a prioritized findings report for quick remediation.

Does the findings report maintain a professional tone when analyzing content?▼

Yes, the findings report maintains a professional tone during the adversarial analysis, avoiding personal attacks while presenting a structured markdown list of identified issues.

How do I get a prioritized findings list for my submitted document?▼

Provide your document as input and request a findings report; the adversarial analysis will output a concise, prioritized markdown list of the top issues ready for remediation.

Related Skills

Explore More Content & Communication Skills→
ncptuanncptuan

bmad-review-adversarial-general

Critically review artifacts and generate at least ten Markdown findings.

Community
Basic
linxuan-syslinxuan-sys
190

doc-coauthoring

Guide structured document coauthoring from context collection to reader effectiveness testing.

Community
Advanced
vmkteamvmkteam
6

solve

Automate end-to-end YouTrack task resolution with human-in-the-loop checkpoints.

Official
Advanced
joekhosbayarjoekhosbayar

bmad-review-adversarial-general

Identify and document issues in content via adversarial review into a Markdown findings report.

Community
Advanced