bmad-review-adversarial-general

An adversarial review requires extreme skepticism to surface problems in product specs or code diffs. You provide the content, and the analysis outputs a structured findings report containing at least ten identified issues for quick remediation.

Adversarial analysis for content quality assurance is a cynical review process that uncovers hidden issues and gaps in documents. It applies skeptical scrutiny to artifacts like stories or design documents to ensure critical examination.

Yes, you can use this adversarial review on any document format. It applies to diffs, specs, stories, documents, or any artifact, requiring only that the provided content is not empty or unreadable to generate a findings report.

The best way to generate a risk analysis findings report for documentation is through a cynical, adversarial review. This workflow receives the content, performs skeptical analysis to surface problems, and presents a concise, actionable list of issues.

Adversarial content review halts on inputs when the provided content is empty or unreadable. These halt conditions prevent the workflow from attempting to perform analysis on artifacts that lack parseable text.