bmad-review-adversarial-general

Identify and document critical weaknesses in content with a structured findings report.

Updated Feb 11, 2026

Search Tags:#reporting #quality-assurance #critique #findings #content-review #adversarial-review

Ready to run

npx skills add https://github.com/mschuerig/peach-ios --skill bmad-review-adversarial-general-mschuerig

💬 Prompt for ChatGPT / Claude Chat▼

Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: bmad-review-adversarial-general
Source: https://github.com/mschuerig/peach-ios/tree/main/_bmad/core/skills/bmad-review-adversarial-general
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/mschuerig/peach-ios --skill bmad-review-adversarial-general-mschuerig

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

This Skill automates the process of performing a cynical, thorough review of content and generating a findings report, helping teams uncover issues and gaps quickly.

Core Features & Use Cases

Adversarial analysis: systematically challenge assumptions and identify problems in any content artifact (diffs, specs, docs, stories).
Findings report: produce a structured list of issues and recommended improvements.
Guided workflow: follows a reproducible process from content intake to final report, enabling consistent reviews across teams.

Quick Start

Provide the content to review and any optional focus areas.

Frequently Asked Questions about bmad-review-adversarial-general

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema

How do I perform an adversarial content review on technical specs and documentation?▼

To perform an adversarial content review, this Skill systematically challenges assumptions in specs, diffs, and docs to identify critical weaknesses. It follows a reproducible workflow from content intake to a final prioritized findings report.

What is an adversarial review and how does it find gaps in proposals?▼

An adversarial review is a cynically rigorous critique that systematically challenges assumptions to expose gaps in proposals. It identifies and documents critical weaknesses, generating a structured findings report with prioritized issues and recommended improvements.

How do I generate a structured findings report for quality assurance?▼

You generate a structured findings report by inputting your content artifacts and any optional focus areas. The Skill automates the critique process, outputting a prioritized list of documented issues and recommendations for quality assurance.

Can I use this adversarial critique across different team artifacts like stories and diffs?▼

Yes, you can use this adversarial critique across different team artifacts. It is explicitly applicable to diffs, specs, docs, stories, and proposals, enabling consistent quality assurance and content review processes across teams.

Does this content review tool require any dependencies or specific components to work?▼

No, this content review tool requires no dependencies or specific components to function. You simply provide the content to review and any optional focus areas to initiate the automated analysis and findings report generation.

What is the best way to systematically challenge assumptions in a technical document?▼

The best way to systematically challenge assumptions is using a guided, reproducible workflow that applies cynical rigor to your technical document. This approach ensures thorough identification of critical weaknesses and produces a structured findings report.