bmad-review-adversarial-general

To perform an adversarial content review, this Skill systematically challenges assumptions in specs, diffs, and docs to identify critical weaknesses. It follows a reproducible workflow from content intake to a final prioritized findings report.

An adversarial review is a cynically rigorous critique that systematically challenges assumptions to expose gaps in proposals. It identifies and documents critical weaknesses, generating a structured findings report with prioritized issues and recommended improvements.

You generate a structured findings report by inputting your content artifacts and any optional focus areas. The Skill automates the critique process, outputting a prioritized list of documented issues and recommendations for quality assurance.

Yes, you can use this adversarial critique across different team artifacts. It is explicitly applicable to diffs, specs, docs, stories, and proposals, enabling consistent quality assurance and content review processes across teams.

No, this content review tool requires no dependencies or specific components to function. You simply provide the content to review and any optional focus areas to initiate the automated analysis and findings report generation.

The best way to systematically challenge assumptions is using a guided, reproducible workflow that applies cynical rigor to your technical document. This approach ensures thorough identification of critical weaknesses and produces a structured findings report.