bmad-review-adversarial-general

To conduct a critical review and generate a findings report, provide your project document to the skill. It performs a skeptical analysis of the content and outputs a detailed Markdown list of findings with precise descriptions.

Skeptical analysis for document review involves critically evaluating content to identify potential issues and improvements. You need this process when assessing project specifications, proposals, or stories to ensure administrative workflows are thoroughly vetted.

Yes, you can use this critical review skill for administrative workflows. It is specifically designed to handle detailed analysis of documents, specifications, or stories, producing a comprehensive findings report suitable for administrative review processes.

The best way to get a detailed findings report is to execute the adversarial review skill on your 'project-report.md' file. It analyzes the content critically and outputs a Markdown list of findings with precise descriptions of potential issues.

The critical review skill is suitable for documents, specifications, or stories. It relies on YAML frontmatter for skill activation and outputs findings in Markdown, so content outside standard administrative document formats may not be optimally processed.