bmad-review-adversarial-general

Analyze submitted content and output a Markdown findings list.

Updated Apr 26, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/Wizarck/iguanatrader --skill bmad-review-adversarial-general-wizarck
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: bmad-review-adversarial-general
Source: https://github.com/Wizarck/iguanatrader/tree/main/skills/bmad-review-adversarial-general
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/Wizarck/iguanatrader --skill bmad-review-adversarial-general-wizarck

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

This skill helps teams quickly identify gaps, inconsistencies, and risks in submitted content by performing a rigorous adversarial review and delivering a structured findings report.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Adversarial analysis that challenges content to surface hidden issues.
  • Findings report that compiles a prioritized list of defects and improvement actions.
  • Use Case: ideal for audit of specs, design docs, or code diffs before release decisions.

Quick Start

Review the provided content and request a findings report detailing actionable issues and recommendations.

Frequently Asked Questions about bmad-review-adversarial-general

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I perform an adversarial review to find issues in my design docs?

An adversarial review critically evaluates design docs to surface hidden gaps and risks. This skill performs rigorous analysis on submitted content and outputs a structured Markdown findings list detailing at least ten actionable issues.

What is the best way to audit code diffs for inconsistencies before release?

Auditing code diffs before release requires identifying gaps and inconsistencies through critical evaluation. This skill challenges submitted artifacts adversarially and generates a prioritized findings report with actionable improvement recommendations.

Can I use this adversarial analysis tool for spec and story evaluation?

Yes, adversarial analysis is applicable for spec and story evaluation. The tool loads your submitted content, performs a cynical critique to uncover hidden issues, and documents them in a structured Markdown findings list.

How do I get a structured findings report from a content critique?

To get a structured findings report, submit your content for critique and request the output. The skill analyzes the artifact, identifies a minimum of ten issues, and compiles a prioritized list of defects and actions in Markdown format.

Does the content analysis require any specific dependencies or components?

No specific dependencies or components are required to perform content analysis. The skill operates independently to load your submitted artifacts, execute the adversarial review, and output the findings list.

When do I need a cynical content review for my documentation?

You need a cynical content review when preparing documentation, specs, or diffs for release decisions. It helps quickly identify hidden risks and inconsistencies by challenging the content and delivering a structured findings report.