What problem does it solve? Code and document reviews are inconsistent: reviewers miss edge cases, skip verification checks, or give unstructured feedback. This Skill runs a structured multi-lens review over any diff, file, spec, or document and returns findings in one canonical format. ## Core Features & Use Cases - Multi-lens review: Shipped lenses cover adversarial analysis, edge-case hunting, verification-gap detection, document structure, and prose copy-editing, each with its own method and findings shape. - Configurable workflow: A customize.toml file controls which lenses run, output format (JSON, markdown, or both), style guides, reader calibration, and standing review directives, with team and personal override files. - Structured findings output: Every finding carries location, trigger condition, guard snippet, and potential consequence, with no severity ranking, and can be written to a report file or presented in chat. - Use Case: Ask for a critical review of a pull request diff; the edge-case lens enumerates unhandled branches, the verification-gap lens checks whether tests would catch a regression, and results arrive as a grouped markdown report plus raw JSON. ## Quick Start Review the changes in my current git diff with all applicable lenses and show me the findings.