skills.rest
LucaDeLeo
LucaDeLeoCOMMUNITY
Explore all skills by this author →
GitHub

bmad-tea-testarch-test-review

Identify and report test quality gaps across unit, integration, and end-to-end tests.

1|1|Updated Jan 17, 2026
Search Tags:#code-quality#quality-assurance#unit-tests#integration-tests#test-automation#test-review
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/LucaDeLeo/ASTN --skill bmad-tea-testarch-test-review-lucadeleo
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent▼
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: bmad-tea-testarch-test-review
Source: https://github.com/LucaDeLeo/ASTN/tree/main/.agents/skills/bmad-tea-testarch-test-review
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/LucaDeLeo/ASTN --skill bmad-tea-testarch-test-review-lucadeleo

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

Helps engineering teams validate the quality and coverage of their tests by enforcing best-practices and providing structured review prompts.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Structured test-review workflow that identifies gaps in unit, integration, and end-to-end tests.
  • Guidance on common anti-patterns, coverage deficits, and quality metrics with concrete improvement suggestions.
  • Use Case: When a team wants to elevate test quality during a release, run this Skill to collect findings and recommended actions.

Quick Start

Analyze the current test suite against the project’s standards and ask the AI to generate a prioritized list of improvements.

Frequently Asked Questions about bmad-tea-testarch-test-review

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I review test suite quality for unit, integration, and end-to-end tests?▼

You can review test suite quality by applying best-practices validation across unit, integration, and end-to-end tests to identify coverage gaps and common anti-patterns, generating a prioritized list of actionable improvements.

What are common test anti-patterns and coverage deficits to look for?▼

Common test anti-patterns and coverage deficits are identified by validating your project tests against established quality assurance metrics, allowing engineering teams to document impact and assign owners for necessary improvements.

How do I generate actionable findings to improve test automation before a release?▼

You can generate actionable test automation findings by running a structured review workflow on your current tests to collect quality gaps, recommended improvements, and impact documentation needed to elevate test quality during a release.

Does this test review process work for typical software languages?▼

Yes, the test review process applies best-practices validation across unit, integration, and end-to-end tests in typical software languages, enabling engineering teams to standardize quality assurance regardless of their specific tech stack.

Why do I need a structured workflow to validate test quality instead of manual checks?▼

A structured workflow is needed to validate test quality because it systematically identifies gaps across unit, integration, and end-to-end tests, providing concrete improvement suggestions and impact documentation that manual checks often miss.

Related Skills

Explore More Software Engineering Skills→
HaRu-LLCHaRu-LLC

quality-plan

Define quality objectives, metrics, QA activities, and acceptance criteria for a project.

Community
Intermediate
masta-g3masta-g3
1

test-coverage

Analyze test coverage and identify gaps with recommended tests.

Community
Intermediate
cpfcoachingcpfcoaching

Testing Anti-Patterns

Analyze Python unit tests to detect common testing anti-patterns.

Community
Intermediate
douglasdennys45douglasdennys45

task-reviewer-best-practices

Review Go tasks for quality, best practices, and problem classification.

Community
Advanced