skills.rest
b566776
b566776COMMUNITY
Explore all skills by this author →
GitHub

bmad-testarch-test-review

Apply TEA best practices to test artifacts and produce a 0–100 quality score report.

Updated May 5, 2026
Search Tags:#automation#workflow#subagents#reporting#quality-assurance#test-review#tea
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/b566776/whitebox --skill bmad-testarch-test-review-b566776
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent▼
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: bmad-testarch-test-review
Source: https://github.com/b566776/whitebox/tree/main/.gemini/skills/bmad-testarch-test-review
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/b566776/whitebox --skill bmad-testarch-test-review-b566776

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill includes scripts (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

Review test quality using best practices validation. It enables teams to measure and improve the reliability and originality of their tests by applying a TEA knowledge-base driven evaluation and producing a standardized quality score.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Orchestrates four quality dimensions (determinism, isolation, maintainability, performance) via subagents or workflow steps.
  • Produces a 0–100 quality score and a structured report suitable for stakeholders.
  • Supports Create, Validate, and Edit modes to generate, review, and revise test-quality outputs, loading relevant knowledge fragments and artifacts.

Quick Start

Run a TEA-guided test-quality review on the current suite and generate a final report.

Frequently Asked Questions about bmad-testarch-test-review

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I quantify test quality and generate a score for my test suite?▼

Test quality quantification applies TEA best practices to evaluate artifacts across determinism, isolation, maintainability, and performance, producing a 0–100 score and a structured stakeholder report.

What dimensions should I review to measure test suite reliability?▼

Reliability reviews evaluate four core dimensions: determinism for consistent results, isolation for dependency-free execution, maintainability for code clarity, and performance for execution speed.

How do I automate test review workflows using subagents?▼

Automated test review orchestrates subagents across quality dimensions and modes like Create, Validate, and Edit to load knowledge fragments, resolve configurations, and output comprehensive reports.

Can I generate new test quality reports and edit existing validation outputs?▼

Yes, the workflow supports Create mode to generate new evaluations, Validate mode to review existing artifacts, and Edit mode to revise test-quality outputs by loading relevant knowledge fragments.

Does test quality automation require external dependencies to run?▼

No external dependencies are required to run the automation workflow; it relies on internal scripts to load workflow configurations and apply TEA best practices directly to your test artifacts.

When should I use a structured test review over manual test evaluation?▼

Structured test reviews are necessary when teams need a standardized 0–100 quality score and comprehensive stakeholder reporting to consistently measure and improve test reliability across large suites.

Related Skills

Explore More Software Engineering Skills→
ImaginerLabsImaginerLabs

bmad-testarch-test-review

Evaluate test quality against TEA knowledge and generate a 0–100 score.

Official
Advanced
genesis-agentsgenesis-agents
2

Relevance Judge

Score candidate entries against a topic with 0-100 relevance ratings.

Community
Intermediate
JohnMarkCaponesJohnMarkCapones
3

senior-qa

Generate test suites and scaffold end-to-end tests for web applications.

Community
Advanced
bmad-code-orgbmad-code-org
88

bmad-testarch-test-review

Analyze test suites to produce a 0-100 quality score and improvement report.

Official
Advanced