Orchestrate multi-persona deliberations to surface trade-offs in design decisions.
npx skills add https://github.com/micfre/BMILD --skill bmild-roundtable
Please help me install this Agent Skill. Skill: bmild-roundtable Source: https://github.com/micfre/BMILD/tree/main/.agents/skills/bmild-roundtable Command: npx skills add https://github.com/micfre/BMILD --skill bmild-roundtable
This Skill solves the problem of getting structured, cross-functional input on complex design and specification decisions without manual coordination of multiple stakeholders, reducing the risk of expensive downstream rework from unvetted, under-discussed choices.
Invoke the bmild-roundtable skill with your complex design or specification question, confirm the proposed attendees, and follow the facilitated deliberation to surface clear trade-offs for your decision.
High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.
Structured multi-persona deliberation surfaces cross-functional trade-offs for complex design decisions by convening configurable design-tier personas. This enforces genuine discussion of trade-offs instead of diplomatic consensus, exposing real tensions between competing valid perspectives.
Structured multi-persona deliberation resolves consequential ambiguity in spec-driven development by surfacing cross-functional trade-offs. This mitigates the risk of expensive downstream rework from unvetted or under-discussed choices by returning trade-off records for user ratification.
You can configure attendance for a design deliberation session by convening any subset of design-tier personas, such as Product, UX, Architect, QA, and Security. This allows you to tailor the cross-functional input specifically to your question's domain.
This deliberation approach enforces a no-recommendation synthesis rule for design choices. Instead of providing a final recommendation, it returns structured trade-off records to the invoking persona or change proposal artifact for explicit user ratification.
You need a multi-persona roundtable for design and specification decisions when competing defensible answers risk expensive downstream rework. It supports both forward-direction design sessions and course-correction consultations by surfacing trade-offs for user ratification.
Multi-persona deliberation avoids diplomatic consensus to ensure genuine discussion of trade-offs. By enforcing a structured diverge-converge flow, it surfaces real tensions between competing valid perspectives rather than masking them with superficial agreement.
wjgoarxivRun an eight-phase adversarial debate with personas to analyze predictions.
The-RabakIdentify and clarify ambiguous requirements through structured brainstorming sessions.
dmedina-devConvert ambiguous requirements into approved design specifications with trade-off analysis.
lyndonklAnalyze decisions by adopting multiple stakeholder perspectives to surface tensions and synthesize consensus.
