bot-issue-qa

Validate claude_bot GitHub issues against Airflow logs and QA criteria.

Updated Aug 23, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/mporenta/airflow --skill bot-issue-qa
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: bot-issue-qa
Source: https://github.com/mporenta/airflow/tree/main/.claude/skills/bot-issue-qa
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/mporenta/airflow --skill bot-issue-qa

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

This Skill automates the QA review and triage of claude_bot issues in Airflow by validating issues against the current logs, scoring accuracy and clarity, and posting a structured QA comment to drive resolution.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Validate issue legitimacy by cross-checking issue content with DAG logs and system state.
  • Score and decide using six criteria: validity, error classification, root-cause accuracy, evidence quality, actionability, and clarity.
  • Post machine-parsable QA comments to automate triage and status updates.
  • Close invalid issues with an added label or enter plan mode to guide fixes for actionable items.

Quick Start

Provide a GitHub issue URL or number and run the QA workflow to produce a structured QA report.

Frequently Asked Questions about bot-issue-qa

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I automate QA review for Airflow claude_bot issues using GitHub URLs?

You can automate QA review for Airflow claude_bot issues by providing a GitHub issue URL or number. The workflow validates the issue against DAG logs and standard QA criteria, then posts a machine-parsable QA comment to guide resolution.

What criteria are used to score and triage Airflow claude_bot issues?

Airflow claude_bot issues are scored using six criteria: validity, error classification, root-cause accuracy, evidence quality, actionability, and clarity. This structured scoring automates triage and drives resolution decisions.

How does the automated QA workflow verify issue legitimacy in Airflow DAGs?

The automated QA workflow verifies issue legitimacy by cross-checking issue content with Airflow DAG logs and system state. It extracts markers from the issue body and reads evidence logs from S3 to validate accuracy.

Can I use this QA triage process to automatically close invalid GitHub issues?

Yes, the QA triage process can close invalid GitHub issues with an added label or enter plan mode to guide fixes for actionable items. It posts a structured QA comment to automate these status updates.

What is the best way to triage claude_bot issues in Airflow with S3 log evidence?

The best way to triage claude_bot issues in Airflow is to run an automated QA workflow that reads evidence logs from S3, scores each criterion, and posts a machine-parsable QA comment to automate resolution.

Why does the automated QA review extract markers from GitHub issue bodies?

Automated QA review extracts markers from GitHub issue bodies to identify and validate issue data against Airflow DAG logs and S3 evidence. This ensures accurate scoring of validity, root-cause, and actionability criteria.