brain-keeper

To log provenance for ingested sources, you capture raw sources untouched and record the ingestion event along with its evidence in the decision log. This ensures every brain page update remains evidence-backed and decision-aware.

Editorial linting for wikilinks is an automated check that enforces link resolution rules and structural constraints. It blocks publishing-grade changes when required references fail, preventing unsupported claims and broken links in the content brain.

You update a canonical brain page by proposing changes only when supported by valid evidence. The update is then recorded as a decision type entry in the log, ensuring strict write boundaries and provenance safety are maintained.

Yes, you can register newly published content into canonical project metadata directories. This registration process ties the content to existing brain structures by mapping it to topic clusters and linking associated evidence.

Your brain page update gets blocked by lint checks because editorial rules enforce strict write boundaries and wikilink resolution. It prevents unsupported claims or broken references from entering the canonical project directories.

To handle contradictions found during source ingestion, the system applies evidence-backed authorial updates and records the conflict resolution as a decision. This maintains consistency and provenance safety across the project brain.