brainstorm

To pressure-test an architecture decision, you use an interactive debate agent that challenges assumptions, explores substitute approaches, and highlights blind spots through a structured multi-turn discussion to converge on a refined solution.

Multi-turn solution refinement is facilitated by a dedicated sub-agent that engages you in an adversarial dialogue, questioning your proposal over several rounds until an unload action produces a final recommended direction.

Yes, you can use it for architecture selection and option exploration. The debate agent drives consideration of substitute approaches and critiques weaknesses to help you rigorously evaluate technical decisions and design problems.

To start the debate, tell the agent your rough architecture idea or design problem and ask it to begin. To end it, use the unload action when you reach agreement or have no further objections, which produces a final recommendation.

You should avoid using an adversarial debate agent when your solution design requires a quick, single-pass answer rather than rigorous critique, as this process explicitly requires multi-turn dialogue and interactive back-and-forth to converge.