brainstorm-skills

Multi-perspective research for complex decision-making is structured through a 4-phase workflow: explore, challenge, synthesize, and act. This approach coordinates parallel agents to evaluate expert viewpoints, surface tensions, and produce actionable recommendations with confidence levels.

The best way to brainstorm strategic decisions that withstand scrutiny is using an iterative research framework with built-in skeptical critique. This method challenges assumptions during a dedicated phase before synthesizing findings, ensuring conclusions are battle-tested and robust.

Yes, you can use parallel agents to synthesize research across different viewpoints. The workflow leverages up to five expert perspectives simultaneously, maintaining state persistence across steps to surface patterns and tensions before loading the final results.

To start the explore phase for deep topic research, initiate the brainstorming command on your topic of interest. This first phase coordinates parallel agents to begin iterative exploration, setting the foundation for the subsequent challenge, synthesize, and act phases.

Yes, the brainstorming workflow provides explicit confidence levels for its recommendations. After completing the multi-perspective synthesis, it outputs actionable recommendations alongside these confidence metrics to support your final strategic decisions.

You should not use a multi-agent workflow for research synthesis when dealing with simple topics that lack complex trade-offs. This approach is specifically designed for tough decisions requiring deep evaluation, robust challenge, and multi-perspective analysis to yield valid conclusions.