brainstorm

To turn vague project requirements into a stable task contract, you elicit missing fields like goal, acceptance criteria, scope, and risks, then materialize them into plan.md and tasks.md. This prevents contract drift and ensures verifiability before implementation.

Preventing contract drift in multi-agent workflows requires enforcing early gates and process rules before planning. By stabilizing ambiguous requests into formal contracts with explicit constraints and assumptions, you ensure goals remain verifiable and aligned throughout execution.

Materializing fuzzy task requests into plan.md and tasks.md involves a clarifying dialogue that converges undefined goals into a formal task contract. It identifies acceptance criteria, scope, and phase breakdown to ensure readiness for tech lead handoff.

You need to formalize a task contract before handing off to a multi-agent workflow when no stable contract exists or when contract drift occurs. This ensures goals, constraints, and phase breakdown are articulated and verifiable before design or implementation begins.

Yes, legion-workflow requires a formal task contract to enable review, verification, and rollback readiness. Converging fuzzy requests into explicit contracts with articulated scope and acceptance criteria ensures the workflow can execute tasks predictably.

Starting implementation without a stable task contract risks scope creep, unverifiable outcomes, and contract drift. Without materializing goals, constraints, and assumptions into plan.md and tasks.md, tech leads cannot guarantee predictable handoff or rollback readiness.