What problem does it solve?
Multi-perspective brainstorming: dispatches multiple SubAgents playing different expert roles (architect, pragmatist, challenger, domain expert) to independently analyze and debate the same design problem. The moderator synthesizes all perspectives to form a consensus solution.
Core Features & Use Cases
- Multi-perspective analysis: independent reviews from diverse expert roles to surface blind spots and trade-offs.
- Synthesis and debate: moderator collects analyses and synthesizes a defensible design proposal through discussion.
- Guardrails: requires at least one round of analysis before any design proposal is presented and includes a requirement for user approval.
- Anti-pattern avoidance: prevents premature conclusions by enforcing multiple perspectives and explicit debate.
Quick Start
Initiate a project brief and trigger parallel expert analyses to reach a consensus design.