brief-protocol

End-to-end legal drafting workflows for court briefs are orchestrated by coordinating intake, drafting, citation verification, and PDF extraction in a strict phase-gated sequence. The process requires explicit user approvals at each stage to ensure an auditable progression from case intake to final draft.

The standard workflow for preparing legal briefs using Korean law sources sequences through korean-law, beopgoeul-search, legal-books, and JuriSupport/MD. This phase-based approach standardizes document drafting and citation validation while keeping explicit human-in-the-loop approvals at each step.

Yes, you can use this briefing protocol for different types of court documents including preparations, answers, opinions, complaints, and appeals. The orchestration applies consistent formatting and citation verification across these standard brief types to maintain a safe, auditable process.

You need JuriSupport MCP integration for primary citation verification during drafting, but offline-law-fallback options are available when MCPs are unavailable. These safety nets ensure citation checks continue safely and maintain an auditable process even without official MCP connectivity.

If official MCPs are unavailable during the citation verification process, the workflow applies offline-law-fallback options as safety nets. This ensures citation checks are completed safely and the overall brief preparation process remains fully auditable without connectivity interruptions.