Separate entangled cognitive questions using a five-step bucket-error process.
npx skills add https://github.com/EquiStamp/CFAR-Claude-Skills --skill bucket-errors
Please help me install this Agent Skill. Skill: bucket-errors Source: https://github.com/EquiStamp/CFAR-Claude-Skills/tree/main/bucket-errors Command: npx skills add https://github.com/EquiStamp/CFAR-Claude-Skills --skill bucket-errors
CFAR bucket-errors identification helps you separate entangled questions that should be handled as distinct, reducing defensiveness and making evidence more actionable. Use it when you feel defensive about truths, confuse unrelated beliefs, have trouble accepting feedback, practice detecting question substitution, or notice you avoid thinking about certain topics.
Identify a current belief or situation where two related questions are fused and run through the five steps to separate them and reassign evidence to the correct bucket.
High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.
Bucket errors are cognitive entanglements where distinct questions fuse into one, causing defensiveness and making evidence hard to process. Separating these buckets reduces conflated beliefs and allows you to reassign evidence to the correct question.
To untangle conflated beliefs during feedback processing, apply a five-step routine: notice the flinch, identify the entanglement, separate the buckets, redistribute evidence, and re-evaluate implications to regain clarity.
Use bucket error detection for self-criticism when you feel defensive about truths, confuse unrelated beliefs, or notice you avoid thinking about certain topics due to anticipated negative implications.
Yes, bucket error untangling works alongside CFAR techniques like Double Crux and Internal Double Crux. It facilitates detecting, untangling, testing implications, and reframing entangled questions within broader rationality practice.
The best way to map entangled questions is using Design Mode to outline the entanglement, then applying the five-step separation process to redistribute evidence and re-evaluate implications for clearer belief management.
Yes, Practice Mode provides structured exercises for detecting question substitution and walking through bucket error detection, allowing you to build the skill without needing a live scenario.
dzackgarzaIdentify root causes of user-corrected actions and draft a rectification plan.
EquiStampIdentify and resolve disagreements by uncovering shared underlying cruxes.
cnbisonApply Charlie Munger's mental models to analyze decisions and investment strategies.
simorgh3196Orchestrate three parallel cognitive-analysis agents into a unified meta-cognition assessment.
